Immortality versus resurrection in the Christian tradition.

Author: Murphy N.
Affiliation:
School of Theology, Fuller Theological Seminary, Pasadena, CA 91182, USA. nmurphy@fuller.edu
Conference/Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci.
Date published: 2011 Oct
Other: Volume ID: 1234 , Pages: 76-82 , Special Notes: doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06132.x. , Word Count: 236


For those in contemporary society who believe in an afterlife, there are a number of views available. The most common may be based on belief in an immortal soul. However, the early Christian account was, instead, bodily resurrection. As Christianity moved throughout the Mediterranean world, apologists and theologians adapted their teaching on human nature and the afterlife to Greek and Roman philosophies. By the time of Augustine (d. 430), the doctrines of body-soul dualism and immortality of the soul were firmly entrenched in Christian teaching. The incorporation of the concept of an immortal soul into Christian accounts of life after death produced a hybrid account. The body dies, the soul (at least of those who were to be saved) travels to heaven. At the end of history, there would be a general resurrection, and the souls would be reunited with their bodies, although the bodies would be in a transformed, indestructible state. This hybrid account of life after death went largely uncontested until the twentieth century. In this essay, I describe this history and argue for a return to the early Christian view of humans as a unity, not a duality, and for belief in resurrection of the body as the appropriate expectation for eternal life. This would not only be truer to Christian sources, but, valuable, I believe, in focusing Christian attention on the need to care for the environment.
© 2011 New York Academy of Sciences.
PMID: 21988252

BACK