The use of complementary medicine in children with atopic dermatitis in secondary care in Leicester

Author: Johnston GA//Bilbao RM//Graham-Brown RA
Affiliation:
Department of Dermatology, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK. graham.johnston@uhl-tr.nhs.uk
Conference/Journal: Br J Dermatol
Date published: 2003
Other: Volume ID: 149 , Issue ID: 3 , Pages: 566-71 , Word Count: 324


BACKGROUND: The use of 'complementary' or 'alternative' medicine continues to rise in patients with skin disease, especially in those with chronic, inflammatory dermatoses. OBJECTIVES: To qualify and quantify the usage of complementary medicine (CM) in children with atopic dermatitis (AD) in secondary care. METHODS: A face-to-face structured questionnaire study of 100 consecutive children with AD and their parent or guardian. RESULTS: The mean age of the children interviewed was 7.3 years (median age 6.0 years, range 0.6-17.1) and ethnic origin was 59% white, 35% Indian, 3% Afro-Caribbean and 3% mixed race. Forty-six of 100 patients (46%) had used, or were currently using, CM. Of the 54 patients who had not yet used CM, 17 of 54 (31%) said they intended to try this in the future. The most commonly used CM was Chinese herbal medicine by 20 of 46 patients (43% of those who had used CM), followed by herbal medicine (41%) and homeopathy (35%). Of 74 patients using CM, 26 (35%) felt their AD had improved while 39 of 74 (53%) reported that it had remained unchanged. Twenty-six of 46 (56%) CM users in this study would not recommend CM to other patients with AD. There was a strong association between the use of CM and ethnicity (P = 0.01). Half of the patients who had used CM (23 of 46) had used it on the recommendation of family or friends with skin disease, 17 of 46 (37%) from family or friends without skin disease and three of 46 (6%) each from health professionals or from the media or internet. Twenty-five of 46 (54%) of CM users did so because conventional treatment was not working, and eight of 46 (17%) because they were worried about the side-effects of conventional treatment. While 39 of 100 (39%) of all patients felt that CM was safer than conventional medicine, only 14 of 100 felt it was more efficacious. Fifty-one of 100 were happy to combine both types of treatment and 66 of 100 felt that CM should be available from the National Health Service. CONCLUSIONS: In a population of children with AD attending a teaching hospital clinic in Leicester, U.K., 63% use or intend to use CM. This use is associated with ethnicity.

BACK