The Effect of Breath Pacing on Task Switching and Working Memory

Author: Maria Paula Bonomini, Mikel Val Calvo, Alejandro Diaz Morcillo, Florencia Segovia, Jose Manuel Ferrandez Vicente, Eduardo Fernandez-Jover
Affiliation:
1 Instituto Argentino de Matemáticas "Alberto P. Calderón" (IAM), CONICET, Saavedra 15, CABA, Argentina.
2 Instituto de Ingeniería Biomédica, Fac. de Ingeniería, Univ. de Buenos Aires (UBA), Paseo Colón 850, CABA, Argentina.
3 Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Juan del Rosal, 16, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
4 Departamento Electrónica, Tecnología de Computadoras y Proyectos, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, Cartagena, Spain.
5 Departamento Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, Cartagena, Spain.
6 Sanatorio Guemes, Francisco Acuña de Figueroa 1240, CABA, Argentina.
7 Instituto de Bioingeniería, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Elche, Spain.
Conference/Journal: Int J Neural Syst
Date published: 2020 Jun
Other: Volume ID: 30 , Issue ID: 6 , Special Notes: doi: 10.1142/S0129065720500288. , Word Count: 206


The cortical and subcortical circuit regulating both cognition and cardiac autonomic interactions are already well established. This circuit has mainly been analyzed from cortex to heart. Thus, the heart rate variability (HRV) is usually considered a reflection of cortical activity. In this paper, we investigate whether HRV changes affect cortical activity. Short-term local autonomic changes were induced by three breathing strategies: spontaneous (Control), normal (NB) and slow paced breathing (SB). We measured the performance in two cognition domains: executive functions and processing speed. Breathing maneuvres produced three clearly differentiated autonomic states, which preconditioned the cognitive tasks. We found that the SB significantly increased the HRV low frequency (LF) power and lowered the power spectral density (PSD) peak to 0.1[Formula: see text]Hz. Meanwhile, executive function was assessed by the working memory test, whose accuracy significantly improved after SB, with no significant changes in the response times. Processing speed was assessed by a multitasking test. Consistently, the proportion of correct answers (success rate) was the only dependent variable affected by short-term and long-term breath pacing. These findings suggest that accuracy, and not timing of these two cognitive domains would benefit from short-term SB in this study population.

Keywords: HRV; breath control; cognitive functions; neurovisceral integration model.

PMID: 32498643

BACK