Walking meditation promotes ankle proprioception and balance performance among elderly women.
Author: Chatutain A1, Pattana J1, Parinsarum T1, Lapanantasin S2
Affiliation:
1Physical Therapy Division, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Srinakharinwirot University, Ongkharak, Nakhon Nayok, 26120, Thailand.
2Physical Therapy Division, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Srinakharinwirot University, Ongkharak, Nakhon Nayok, 26120, Thailand. Electronic address: saitida@g.swu.ac.th.
Conference/Journal: J Bodyw Mov Ther.
Date published: 2019 Jul
Other:
Volume ID: 23 , Issue ID: 3 , Pages: 652-657 , Special Notes: doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2018.09.152. Epub 2018 Oct 25. , Word Count: 301
BACKGROUND: Age-related change of proprioception affects body balance among the elderly. Walking meditation (WM)-a mindfulness practice-involves focusing on leg movements while walking slowly, possibly improving brain processes for perception and balance adjustments. This study investigates the WM's effects on ankle proprioception and balance among the elderly.
METHODS: Fifty-eight women aged 69.25 ± 6.06 were randomized into control (n = 29) and WM (n = 29) groups. The WM group engaged in 8 weeks of WM practice (30 min/day, 3 days/week). The absolute angular error of the ankle reposition test (AAE) was measured by an electrogoniometer. The balance performance was evaluated using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Functional Reach Test (FRT), and Timed Up and Go test (TUG). Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test and BBS with nonparametric statistics.
RESULTS: At baseline, the WM group's AAE, BBS, FRT, and TUG were 4.2 ± 1.6°, 51.3 ± 4.1 points, 21.7 ± 5.7 cm, and 11.1 ± 2.5 s, respectively, whereas those of the control group were 3.6 ± 2.0°, 51.0 ± 5.0 points, 21.6 ± 5.2 cm, and 10.2 ± 3.1 s, respectively. Post-training, WM group showed significant decrease in AAE (2.4 ± 0.9°) and displayed improvements in BBS, FRT, and TUG (55.4 ± 0.9 points, 29.1 ± 5.8 cm, and 8.1 ± 1.1 s, respectively) (p < 0.01). Conversely, the control group presented no change in AAE, significant decreases in BBS and FRT, and slower TUG (p < 0.01). No difference was found between WM and control groups at the baseline. However, post-training, WM group demonstrated significant improvements in AAE, BBS, FRT, and TUG as compared to the control group (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: WM practice improved the balance and ankle reposition sense among the elderly. It can be used as an alternative form of training to promote balance and ankle proprioception. The results supported that balance performance worsens among the elders who do not engage in physical training.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
KEYWORDS: Ankle reposition; Berg balance scale; Functional reach; Old people; Timed up and go
PMID: 31563384 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2018.09.152
BACK
