Author: Thompson-Lastad A1, Gardiner P2, Chao MT3
Affiliation:
1Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, UC San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
2Department of Family Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
3Division of General Internal Medicine and Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, UC San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Conference/Journal: Health Equity.
Date published: 2019 Jan 25
Other:
Volume ID: 3 , Issue ID: 1 , Pages: 1-8 , Special Notes: doi: 10.1089/heq.2018.0081. eCollection 2019. , Word Count: 199
Purpose: Integrative group medical visits (IGMVs) aim to increase access to complementary and integrative health care, which is particularly relevant for low-income people. We sought to describe IGMV programs in US safety-net clinics through a survey of providers. Methods: An online and paper survey was conducted to collect data on the use of complementary health approaches and characteristics of IGMV programs. We recruited a purposive sample of safety-net clinicians via national meetings and listservs. Results: Fifty-seven clinicians reported on group medical visits. Forty percent worked in federally qualified health centers, 57% in safety-net or teaching hospitals, 23% in other settings such as free clinics. Thirty-seven respondents in 11 states provided care in IGMVs, most commonly for chronic pain and diabetes. Nutrition (70%), mindfulness/meditation/breathing (59%), and tai chi/yoga/other movement practices (51%) were the most common treatment approaches in IGMVs. Conclusion: Safety-net institutions in 11 states offered IGMVs to treat a range of chronic conditions. IGMVs are an innovative model to improve access to non-pharmacologic approaches to chronic illness care and health promotion. They may advance health equity by serving patients negatively impacted by health and health care disparities.
KEYWORDS: chronic disease; community health centers; integrative medicine; safety-net providers
PMID: 30706043 PMCID: PMC6352502 DOI: 10.1089/heq.2018.0081