Author: Oh B1,2,3, Yeung A4, Klein P5, Larkey L6, Ee C7, Zaslawski C8, Knobf T9, Payne P10, Stener-Victorin E11, Lee R12, Choi W13, Chun M14, Bonucci M15, Lang HD16, Pavlakis N17, Boyle F18, Clarke S19, Back M20, Yang P21, Wei Y22, Guo X23, Weng CD24, Irwin MR25, Elfiky AA26, Rosenthal D27
Affiliation:
1Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. byeong.oh@sydney.edu.au.
2School of Life Science, University of Technology, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia. byeong.oh@sydney.edu.au.
3Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. byeong.oh@sydney.edu.au.
4Massachusetts General Hospital; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. AYEUNG@mgh.harvard.edu.
5D'Youville College, Buffalo, NY 14201, USA. kleinqpj@gmail.com.
6College of Nursing & Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA. linda.larkey@asu.edu.
7National Institute of Complementary Medicine Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2751, Australia. C.Ee@westernsydney.edu.au.
8School of Life Science, University of Technology, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia. Chris.Zaslawski@uts.edu.au.
9School of Nursing, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. tish.knobf@yale.edu.
10Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA. Peter.Payne@dartmouth.edu.
11Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, 17165 Stockholm, Sweden. elisabet.stener-victorin@ki.se.
12School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. richard.t.lee@case.edu.
13Department of Family Medicine, The Catholic University College of Medicine, Seoul 06591, Korea. fmchs85@gmail.com.
14Department of Radiation Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 443749, Korea. chunm@ajou.ac.kr.
15San Feliciano Hospital Rome, University of Chieti, 83-00166 Chieti, Italy. maxbonucci@artoi.it.
16Hanne-Doris Lang Medical Center, 20099 Hamburg, Germany. mail@hdlang.de.
17Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. nick.pavlakis@sydney.edu.au.
18Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. franb@bigpond.net.au.
19Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. stephen.clarke@sydney.edu.au.
20Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. michael.back@sydney.edu.au.
21The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. pyang@mdanderson.org.
22School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China. weiyulong@bucm.edu.cn.
23The Second Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, China. guoxinfeng@gzucm.edu.cn.
24College of Tai Chi, University of East-West Medicine, Sunnyvale, CA 94085, USA. drcweng@aol.com.
25Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and the David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. mirwin1@ucla.edu.
26Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. aymen.elfiky@sloan.mit.edu.
27Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Drose@huhs.harvard.edu.
Conference/Journal: Medicines (Basel).
Date published: 2018 Jun 8
Other:
Volume ID: 5 , Issue ID: 2 , Special Notes: doi: 10.3390/medicines5020051. , Word Count: 268
Evidence of the health and wellbeing benefits of Tai Chi and Qigong (TQ) have emerged in the past two decades, but TQ is underutilized in modern health care in Western countries due to lack of promotion and the availability of professionally qualified TQ instructors. To date, there are no government regulations for TQ instructors or for training institutions in China and Western countries, even though TQ is considered to be a part of Traditional Chinese medicine that has the potential to manage many chronic diseases. Based on an integrative health care approach, the accreditation standard guideline initiative for TQ instructors and training institutions was developed in collaboration with health professionals, integrative medicine academics, Tai Chi and Qigong master instructors and consumers including public safety officers from several countries, such as Australia, Canada, China, Germany, Italy, Korea, Sweden and USA. In this paper, the rationale for organizing the Medical Tai Chi and Qigong Association (MTQA) is discussed and the accreditation standard guideline for TQ instructors and training institutions developed by the committee members of MTQA is presented. The MTQA acknowledges that the proposed guidelines are broad, so that the diversity of TQ instructors and training institutions can be integrated with recognition that these guidelines can be developed with further refinement. Additionally, these guidelines face challenges in understanding the complexity of TQ associated with different principles, philosophies and schools of thought. Nonetheless, these guidelines represent a necessary first step as primary resource to serve and guide health care professionals and consumers, as well as the TQ community.
KEYWORDS: Qigong; Tai Chi; accreditation; certification; guideline; standards
PMID: 29890675 PMCID: PMC6023434 DOI: 10.3390/medicines5020051