Efficacy of a biomechanically-based yoga exercise program in knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial.
Author: Kuntz AB1, Chopp-Hurley JN2, Brenneman EC1, Karampatos S2, Wiebenga EG2, Adachi JD3, Noseworthy MD4, Maly MR1,2,5
Affiliation:
1Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
2School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
3Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
4Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
5Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Conference/Journal: PLoS One.
Date published: 2018 Apr 17
Other:
Volume ID: 13 , Issue ID: 4 , Pages: e0195653 , Special Notes: doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195653. eCollection 2018. , Word Count: 360
OBJECTIVE: Certain exercises could overload the osteoarthritic knee. We developed an exercise program from yoga postures with a minimal knee adduction moment for knee osteoarthritis. The purpose was to compare the effectiveness of this biomechanically-based yoga exercise (YE), with traditional exercise (TE), and a no-exercise attention-equivalent control (NE) for improving pain, self-reported physical function and mobility performance in women with knee osteoarthritis.
DESIGN: Single-blind, three-arm randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Community in Southwestern Ontario, Canada.
PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 31 women with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis was recruited through rheumatology, orthopaedic and physiotherapy clinics, newspapers and word-of-mouth.
INTERVENTIONS: Participants were stratified by disease severity and randomly allocated to one of three 12-week, supervised interventions. YE included biomechanically-based yoga exercises; TE included traditional leg strengthening on machines; and NE included meditation with no exercise. Participants were asked to attend three 1-hour group classes/sessions each week.
MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes were pain, self-reported physical function and mobility performance. Secondary outcomes were knee strength, depression, and health-related quality of life. All were assessed by a blinded assessor at baseline and immediately following the intervention.
RESULTS: The YE group demonstrated greater improvements in KOOS pain (mean difference of 22.9 [95% CI, 6.9 to 38.8; p = 0.003]), intermittent pain (mean difference of -19.6 [95% CI, -34.8 to -4.4; p = 0.009]) and self-reported physical function (mean difference of 17.2 [95% CI, 5.2 to 29.2; p = 0.003]) compared to NE. Improvements in these outcomes were similar between YE and TE. However, TE demonstrated a greater improvement in knee flexor strength compared to YE (mean difference of 0.1 [95% CI, 0.1 to 0.2]. Improvements from baseline to follow-up were present in quality of life score for YE and knee flexor strength for TE, while both also demonstrated improvements in mobility. No improvement in any outcome was present in NE.
CONCLUSIONS: The biomechanically-based yoga exercise program produced clinically meaningful improvements in pain, self-reported physical function and mobility in women with clinical knee OA compared to no exercise. While not statistically significant, improvements in these outcomes were larger than those elicited from the traditional exercise-based program. Though this may suggest that the yoga program may be more efficacious for knee OA, future research studying a larger sample is required.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02370667).
PMID: 29664955 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195653
BACK
