Pulsed magnetic field versus ultrasound in the treatment of postnatal carpal tunnel syndrome: A randomized controlled trial in the women of an Egyptian population.
Author: Kamel DM1, Hamed NS2, Abdel Raoof NA3, Tantawy SA4
Affiliation:
1Department of Physical Therapy for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, P.O. Box 12612, Giza, Egypt; Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences. Ahlia University, P.O. Box 10878, Manama, Bahrain.
2Department of Physical Therapy for Neuromuscular Disorders and Its Surgery, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, P.O. Box 12612, Giza, Egypt.
3Department of Basic Science for Physical Therapy, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, P.O. Box 12612, Giza, Egypt.
4Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences. Ahlia University, P.O. Box 10878, Manama, Bahrain; Center of Radiation, Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Conference/Journal: J Adv Res.
Date published: 2017 Jan
Other:
Volume ID: 8 , Issue ID: 1 , Pages: 45-53 , Word Count: 274
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of pulsed electromagnetic field versus pulsed ultrasound in treating patients with postnatal carpal tunnel syndrome. The study was a randomized, double-blinded trial. Forty postnatal female patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome were divided randomly into two equal groups. One group received pulsed electromagnetic field, with nerve and tendon gliding exercises for the wrist, three times per week for four weeks. The other group received pulsed ultrasound and the same wrist exercises. Pain level, sensory and motor distal latencies and conduction velocities of the median nerve, functional status scale and hand grip strength were assessed pre- and post-treatment. There was a significant decrease (P < 0.05) in pain level, sensory and motor distal latencies of the median nerve, and significant increase (P < 0.05) in sensory and motor conduction velocities of the median nerve and hand grip strength in both groups, with a significant difference between the two groups in favour of pulsed electromagnetic field treatment. However, the functional status scale showed intergroup no significant difference (P > 0.05). In conclusion, while the symptoms were alleviated in both groups, pulsed electromagnetic field was more effective than pulsed ultrasound in treating postnatal carpal tunnel syndrome.
KEYWORDS: CTS, carpal tunnel syndrome; CTSQ, carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire; Carpal tunnel syndrome; EMG, electromyography; Electromagnetic field; MMCV, median motor conduction velocity; MMDL, median motor distal latency; MSCV, median sensory conduction velocity; MSDL, median segmental sensory distal latency; MSDL, median sensory distal latency; NCSs, nerve conduction studies; NCV, nerve conduction velocity; Nerve conduction velocity; PEMF, pulsed electromagnetic magnetic field; Pain; Postnatal; Pregnancy; Pulsed ultrasound; US, ultrasound; VAS, visual analogue scale
PMID: 27980864 DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2016.11.001
BACK
