Types of Control in Acupuncture Clinical Trials Might Affect the Conclusion of the Trials: A Review of Acupuncture on Pain Management.
Author: Chen H1, Ning Z2, Lam WL2, Lam WY2, Zhao YK2, Yeung JW3, Ng BF4, Ziea ET4, Lao L5
Affiliation:
1School of Chinese Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Department of Chinese Medicine, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
2School of Chinese Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
3School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
4The Chinese Medicine Department, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong, China.
5School of Chinese Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Department of Chinese Medicine, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China. Electronic address: lxlao1@hku.hk.
Conference/Journal: J Acupunct Meridian Stud.
Date published: 2016 Oct
Other:
Volume ID: 9 , Issue ID: 5 , Pages: 227-233 , Special Notes: doi: 10.1016/j.jams.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Sep 15. , Word Count: 223
Analgesic effects of acupuncture have been extensively studied in various clinical trials. However, the conclusion remains controversial, even among large scale randomized controlled trials. This study aimed to evaluate the association between the conclusion of the trials and the types of control used in those trials via systematic review. Published randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for pain were retrieved from electronic databases (Medline, AMED, Cochrane libraries, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Clinicaltrials.gov, and CAB Abstracts) using a prespecified search strategy. One hundred and thirty-nine studies leading to 166 pairs of acupuncture-control treatment effect comparisons (26 studies comprised of 53 intervention-control pairs) were analyzed based on the proportion of positive conclusions in different control designs. We found that treatment effects of acupuncture compared with nontreatment controls had the highest tendency to yield a positive conclusion (84.3%), compared with nonneedle-insertion controls (53.3%). Whereas with needle-insertion controls, the lowest tendency of positive conclusions was observed (37.8%). Consistently, in studies reporting successful blinding, a higher tendency of positive findings on the treatment effect of acupuncture was found in the noninsertion sham controls compared with that in the insertion sham controls. We conclude that the type of control is likely to affect the conclusion in acupuncture analgesic trials. Appropriate control should be chosen according to the aims of studies.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier B.V.
KEYWORDS: acupuncture; control; pain; randomized controlled trial
PMID: 27776760 DOI: 10.1016/j.jams.2016.08.001
BACK
