Author: Tao WW, Jiang H, Tao XM, Jiang P, Sha LY, Sun XC
1College of Nursing, Dalian Medical University, Dalian. Electronic address: firstname.lastname@example.org. 2School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing. 3Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China. 4Graduate School, Dalian Medical University, Dalian. 5College of Nursing, Dalian Medical University, Dalian. 6College of Public Health, Dalian Medical University, Dalian.
Conference/Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage.
Date published: 2016 Feb 12
Other: Pages: S0885-3924(16)00055-5 , Special Notes: doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.11.027. [Epub ahead of print] , Word Count: 388
CONTEXT: Most cancer patients suffer from both the disease itself and symptoms induced by conventional treatment. Available literature on the clinical effects on cancer patients of acupuncture, Tuina, Tai Chi, Qigong, and Traditional Chinese Medicine Five Element Music Therapy (TCM FEMT) reports controversial results.
OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of acupuncture, Tuina, Tai Chi, Qigong, and TCM FEMT on various symptoms and quality of life (QOL) in patients with cancer; risk of bias for the selected trials also was assessed.
METHODS: Studies were identiﬁed by searching electronic databases (MEDLINE via both PubMed and Ovid, Cochrane Central, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Scientific Journal Database, China Biology Medicine, and Wanfang Database). All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using acupuncture, Tuina, Tai Chi, Qigong, or TCM FEMT published prior to October 2, 2014 were selected, regardless of whether the paper was published in Chinese or English.
RESULTS: We identified 67 RCTs (5465 patients) that met our inclusion criteria to perform this meta-analysis. Analysis results showed that a significant combined effect was observed for QOL change in patients with terminal cancer in favor of acupuncture and Tuina (Cohen's d: 0.21-4.55, P<0.05), while Tai Chi and Qigong had no effect on QOL of breast cancer survivors (P>0.05). The meta-analysis also demonstrated that acupuncture produced small-to-large effects on adverse symptoms including pain, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and some gastrointestinal discomfort; however, no significant effect was found on the frequency of hot flashes (Cohen's d =-0.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.49, 1.45; P =0.97; I2 = 36%) and mood distress (P>0.05). Tuina relieved gastrointestinal discomfort. TCM FEMT lowered depression level. Tai Chi improved vital capacity of breast cancer patients. High risk of bias was present in 74.63% of the selected RCTs. Major sources of risk of bias were lack of blinding, allocation concealment and incomplete outcome data.
CONCLUSION: Taken together, although there are some clear limitations regarding the body of research reviewed in this study, a tentative conclusion can be reached that acupuncture, Tuina, Tai Chi, Qigong, or TCM FEMT represent beneficial adjunctive therapies. Future study reporting in this field should be improved regarding both method and content of interventions and research methods.
Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
KEYWORDS: Acupuncture; Qigong; Tai Chi; cancer; massage; meta-analysis; symptom management
PMID: 26880252 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]