Expectancy in real and sham electroacupuncture: does believing make it so?

Author: Bauml J1, Xie SX1, Farrar JT1, Bowman MA1, Li SQ1, Bruner D1, DeMichele A1, Mao JJ2.
Affiliation:
1Division of Hematology/Oncology (JB, AD), Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (SXX, JTF, AD, JJM), Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care (JTF), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (SQL, JJM), Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (JB, AD); Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (JB, AD, JJM); Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (SXX, JTF, AD, JJM) and Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care (JTF), Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, OH (MAB); Nell Hodgson School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (DB). 2Division of Hematology/Oncology (JB, AD), Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (SXX, JTF, AD, JJM), Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care (JTF), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (SQL, JJM), Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (JB, AD); Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (JB, AD, JJM); Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (SXX, JTF, AD, JJM) and Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care (JTF), Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, OH (MAB); Nell Hodgson School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (DB). jun.mao@uphs.upenn.edu.
Conference/Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr.
Date published: 2014 Nov
Other: Volume ID: 2014 , Issue ID: 50 , Pages: 302-7 , Special Notes: doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgu029 , Word Count: 258


BACKGROUND:
The large placebo effect observed in prior acupuncture trials presents a substantial challenge for interpretation of the efficacy of acupuncture. We sought to evaluate the relationship between response expectancy, a key component of the placebo effect over time, and treatment outcome in real and sham electroacupuncture (EA).
METHODS:
We analyzed data from a randomized controlled trial of EA and sham acupuncture (SA) for joint pain attributable to aromatase inhibitors among women with breast cancer. Responders were identified using the Patient Global Impression of Change instrument at Week 8 (end of intervention). The Acupuncture Expectancy Scale (AES) was used to measure expectancy four times during the trial. Linear mixed-effects models were used to evaluate the association between expectancy and treatment response.
RESULTS:
In the wait list control group, AES remained unchanged over treatment. In the SA group, Baseline AES was significantly higher in responders than nonresponders (15.5 vs 12.1, P = .005) and AES did not change over time. In the EA group, Baseline AES scores did not differ between responders and nonresponders (14.8 vs 15.3, P = .64); however, AES increased in responders compared with nonresponders over time (P = .004 for responder and time interaction term) with significant difference at the end of trial for responders versus nonresponders (16.2 vs 11.7, P = .004).
CONCLUSIONS:
Baseline higher response expectancy predicts treatment response in SA, but not in EA. Divergent mechanisms may exist for how SA and EA influence pain outcomes, and patients with low expectancy may do better with EA than SA.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
PMID: 25749596

BACK

Copyright © 2004-2024 Qigong Institute. All rights reserved.