Prevalence of visits to five types of complementary and alternative medicine practitioners by the general population: A systematic review.
Author: Cooper KL, Harris PE, Relton C, Thomas KJ.
Affiliation:
School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK. Electronic address: k.l.cooper@sheffield.ac.uk.
Conference/Journal: Complement Ther Clin Pract.
Date published: 2013 Nov
Other:
Volume ID: 19 , Issue ID: 4 , Pages: 214-20 , Special Notes: doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2013.06.006 , Word Count: 157
OBJECTIVE:
To systematically review surveys of 12-month prevalence of visits to complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) practitioners for five therapies: acupuncture, homeopathy, osteopathy, chiropractic, and medical herbalism.
METHODS:
Studies were identified via database searches to 2011. Study quality was assessed using a six-item tool.
RESULTS:
Forty-one surveys across 12 countries were included. Twenty-five (61%) met four of six quality criteria. Prevalence of visits by adults were (median, range): acupuncturists 1.4% (0.2-7.5%, N = 27 surveys), homeopaths 1.5% (0.2-2.9%, N = 20 surveys), osteopaths 1.9% (0.2-4.4%, N = 9 surveys), chiropractors 7.5% (0.3-16.7, N = 33 surveys), medical herbalists 0.9% (0.3-4.7%, N = 14 surveys). Estimates were slightly lower for children and higher for older adults. There was little change over the past 15-20 years.
CONCLUSIONS:
This review summarises 12-month prevalence of visits to CAM practitioners in Europe, North America, Australia, East Asia, Saudi Arabia and Israel. A small but significant percentage of these general populations visit CAM practitioners each year.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
KEYWORDS:
Acupuncture, Complementary therapies, Homeopathy, Prevalence, Systematic review
PMID: 24199976
BACK
