This paper describes characteristics of sophisticated use of psychophysiological therapy procedures and describes a scoping review of evidence that adding psychophysiological procedures to psychotherapy improves outcome. It also reviews literature describing comparisons between psychophysiological procedures and various CBT and other verbal psychotherapy procedures when used as monotherapies. Some details of progressive muscle relaxation, autogenic training, and biofeedback are described that often are omitted in standard clinical training, including the method of diminishing tensions and differential relaxation training in progressive muscle relaxation, use of autogenic discharges and hypnotic instructions in autogenic training, and resonance frequency training in heart rate variability biofeedback and slow breathing. Although these details are often also missing in outcome studies, tentative conclusions can still be drawn from the empirical literature. As a monotherapy, psychophysiological methods are generally as powerful as verbal psychotherapies, although combining them with psychotherapy yields a larger effect than either approach alone. Psychophysiological methods have their strongest effects on anxiety and depression, with weaker effects for panic and PTSD, particularly when compared with exposure therapy, although the latter comparisons were restricted to relaxation training as a psychophysiological approach. Effects of psychophysiological interventions are weaker among elementary school children than among adults and adolescents. The results suggest that psychophysiological methods should be used along with other psychotherapeutic interventions for greatest effect.

Keywords: Autogenic training; Biofeedback; Progressive muscle relaxation; Psychotherapy.

PMID: 39487925 DOI: 10.1007/s10484-024-09667-w

The Importance of Including Psychophysiological Methods in Psychotherapy