Author: Shuangshuang Xu1
Affiliation: <sup>1</sup> Academy of Future Education, Xi'an-Jiaotong Liverpool University, Suzhou, China. Shuangshuang.xu@xjtlu.edu.cn.
Conference/Journal: Integr Psychol Behav Sci
Date published: 2024 Jul 24
Other:
Special Notes: doi: 10.1007/s12124-024-09840-0. , Word Count: 161
Resuming the theoretical and historical conceptualization of mindfulness research is of utmost importance if we want to transcend the positivistic and instrumental trend in the present field and to understand better what mindfulness is and how mindfulness works. Based on von Fircks (2023)'s introduction of Daosim's wu wei into Meadian Social Psychology, this commentary continues dialoguing the two different traditions for understanding mindfulness's functioning by exploring the systematic principle underlying wu wei. From the systematic perspective, we can distinguish: 1) two focus of meaning in wu wei: (a) not forcing/interfering and (b) the existence of a spontaneously evolving system; 2) two positions a person can take faced with the spontaneous system: (a) as stepping back and not interfering; (b) as actively connecting and cultivating new relations into systems. Based on the two positions, the dynamic emergence of altered I from mindfulness is also approached in two different ways.
Keywords: Daosim; I/me; Mindfulness; Spontaneity; Wu wei.
PMID: 39044094 DOI: 10.1007/s12124-024-09840-0