Unraveling the temporal interplay of slow-paced breathing and prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation on cardiac indices of autonomic activity

Author: Zefeng Li1, Emmanuelle Schoonjans1, Jens Allaert1,2, Stefanie De Smet1, Mitchel Kappen1, Joni Houfflyn2, Cristina Ottaviani3, Rudi De Raedt2, Matias M Pulopulos2, Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt1
Affiliation: <sup>1</sup> Department of Head and Skin, Ghent Experimental Psychiatry Lab, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. <sup>2</sup> Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. <sup>3</sup> Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Conference/Journal: Psychophysiology
Date published: 2024 Jul 12
Other: Pages: e14650 , Special Notes: doi: 10.1111/psyp.14650. , Word Count: 261


The neurovisceral integration model proposes that information flows bidirectionally between the brain and the heart via the vagus nerve, indexed by vagally mediated heart rate variability (vmHRV). Voluntary reduction in breathing rate (slow-paced breathing, SPB, 5.5 Breathing Per Minute (BPM)) can enhance vmHRV. Additionally, prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can modulate the excitability of the prefrontal region and influence the vagus nerve. However, research on the combination of SPB and prefrontal tDCS to increase vmHRV and other cardiac (heart rate (HR) and blood pressure) and peripheral (skin conductance) indices is scarce. We hypothesized that the combination of 20 min of SPB and prefrontal tDCS would have a greater effect than each intervention in isolation. Hence, 200 participants were divided into four groups: active tDCS with SPB, active tDCS with 15 BPM breathing, sham tDCS with SPB, and sham tDCS with 15 BPM breathing. Regardless of the tDCS condition, the 5.5 BPM group showed a significant increase in vmHRV over 20 minutes and significant decreases in HR at the first and second 5-min epochs of the intervention. Regardless of breathing condition, the active tDCS group exhibited higher HR at the fourth 5-min epoch of the intervention than the sham tDCS group. No other effects were observed. Overall, SPB is a robust technique for increasing vmHRV, whereas prefrontal tDCS may produce effects that counteract those of SPB. More research is necessary to test whether and how SPB and neuromodulation approaches can be combined to improve cardiac vagal tone.

Keywords: blood pressure; heart rate; heart rate variability; skin conductance levels; slow‐paced breathing; transcranial direct current stimulation.

PMID: 38997945 DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14650