Author: Ziying Ye1, Honghao Lai2, Jinling Ning3, Jianing Liu4, Jiajie Huang5, Sihong Yang6, Jiayue Jin7, Yajie Liu8, Jie Liu9, Hui Zhao10, Long Ge11
Affiliation: <sup>1</sup> Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China. Electronic address: yeziyingecho@163.com.
<sup>2</sup> Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China. Electronic address: enenlhh@outlook.com.
<sup>3</sup> Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China. Electronic address: n13038043985@163.com.
<sup>4</sup> School of Nursing, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China. Electronic address: 1761593592@qq.com.
<sup>5</sup> School of Nursing, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China. Electronic address: huang125013@outlook.com.
<sup>6</sup> Institute of Basic Research of Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China; China Center for Evidence Based Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China. Electronic address: sihong_yang@bucm.edu.can.
<sup>7</sup> Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China. Electronic address: jinjiayue2009@163.com.
<sup>8</sup> Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. Electronic address: doctorlyj@vip.qq.com.
<sup>9</sup> Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. Electronic address: dr.liujie@163.com.
<sup>10</sup> Institute of Basic Research of Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China; China Center for Evidence Based Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China. Electronic address: huizh_519@126.com.
<sup>11</sup> Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China; World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation, Lanzhou, China. Electronic address: gelong2009@163.com.
Conference/Journal: J Ethnopharmacol
Date published: 2023 Dec 18
Other:
Pages: 117601 , Special Notes: doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2023.117601. , Word Count: 538
Ethnopharmacological relevance:
Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) represents a rich repository of empirically-developed traditional medicines. The findings call for more rigorous study into the efficacy, safety, and mechanisms of action of TCM remedies to strengthen the evidence base.
Aim of the study:
To systematically review the quality of insomnia clinical practice guidelines that involve TCM recommendations and to summarize the certainty of evidence supporting the recommendations, strength, and consistency of recommendations, providing valuable research references for the development of future insomnia guidelines.
Materials and methods:
We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese Medical Association, Chinese Sleep Research Society, Medsci, Medlive, British National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), and the International Guidelines Collaboration Network (GIN) for clinical practice guidelines on insomnia from inception to March 5, 2023. Four evaluators conducted independent assessments of the quality of the guidelines by employing the AGREE II tool. Subsequently, the guideline recommendations were consolidated and presented as evidence maps.
Results:
Thirteen clinical practice guidelines addressing insomnia, encompassing 211 recommendations (consisting of 127 evidence-based and 84 expert consensus recommendations), were deemed eligible for inclusion in our analysis. The evaluation results revealed an overall suboptimal quality, with the "scope and purpose" domain achieving the highest score (58.1%), while the "applicability" domain garnered the lowest score (13.0%). Specifically, it was observed that 74.8% (n = 95) of the evidence-based recommendations were supported by evidence of either very low or low certainty, in contrast to the expert consensus recommendations, which accounted for 61.9% (n = 52). We subsequently synthesized 44 recommendations into four evidence maps, focusing on proprietary Chinese medicines, Chinese medicine prescriptions, acupuncture, and massage, respectively. Notably, Chinese herbal remedies and acupuncture exhibited robust support, substantiated by high-certainty evidence, exemplified by interventions such as Xuefu Zhuyu decoction, spleen decoction, body acupuncture, and ear acupuncture, resulting in solid recommendations. Conversely, proprietary Chinese medicines needed more high-certainty evidence, predominantly yielding weak recommendations. As for other therapies, the level of certainty was predominantly categorized as low or very low. Recommendations about magnetic therapy, bathing, and fumigation relied primarily on expert consensus, needing more substantive clinical research evidence, consequently forming weak recommendations. Hot ironing and acupoint injection recommendations were weakly endorsed, primarily based on observational studies. Furthermore, interventions like qigong, gua sha, and moxibustion displayed a relatively limited number of clinical studies, necessitating further exploration to ascertain their efficacy.
Conclusions:
Our analysis revealed a need for substantial improvement in the quality of all the included guidelines related to insomnia. Notably, recommendations for Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) treatments predominantly rely on low-certainty evidence. This study represents a pioneering effort in the utilization of recommendation mapping to both present and identify existing gaps in the evidence landscape within TCM therapies, thus setting the stage for future research initiatives. The evidence supporting TCM therapy recommendations must be fortified to achieve a more substantial level of recommendation and higher certainty. Consequently, there exists a critical and pressing demand for high-quality clinical investigations dedicated to TCM, with a specific focus on ascertaining its long-term efficacy, safety, and potential side effects in the context of insomnia treatment. These endeavors are poised to establish a robust scientific foundation to inform the development of TCM therapy recommendations within the insomnia guidelines.
Keywords: Chinese medicine; Clinical practice guidelines; Insomnia; Recommendations.
PMID: 38122913 DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2023.117601