Author: Bernie Garrett1, Marliss Riou1
Affiliation: <sup>1</sup> School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Conference/Journal: Nurs Open
Date published: 2021 Sep 1
Other:
Volume ID: 8 , Issue ID: 5 , Pages: 2318-2330 , Special Notes: doi: 10.1002/nop2.841. , Word Count: 164
Aim:
To synthesize the most recent evidence investigating the effectiveness and safety of therapeutic touch as a complementary therapy in clinical health applications.
Design:
A rapid evidence assessment (REA) approach was used to review recent TT research adopting PRISMA 2009 guidelines.
Methods:
CINAHL, PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane databases, Web of Science, PsychINFO and Google Scholar were screened between January 2009-March 2020 for studies exploring TT therapies as an intervention. The main outcome measures were for pain, anxiety, sleep, nausea and functional improvement.
Results:
Twenty-one studies covering a range of clinical issues were identified, including 15 randomized-controlled trials, four quasi-experimental studies, one chart review study and one mixed methods study including 1,302 patients. Eighteen of the studies reported positive outcomes. Only four exhibited a low risk of bias. All others had serious methodological flaws, bias issues, were statistically underpowered and scored as low-quality studies. No high-quality evidence was found for any of the benefits claimed.
Keywords: alternative medicine; complementary therapies; energy-healing; human-biofield; pseudoscience; therapeutic touch.
PMID: 33742792 PMCID: PMC8363410 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.841