Author: Fei-Chi Yang, BSc, MSc, MPT, Aishwarya B. Desai, BSc, MPT, Pelareh Esfahani, BSc (Kin), MPT, Tatiana V. Sokolovskaya, BSc (Kin), MPT, and Doreen J. Bartlett, PhD
Affiliation: Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. Address correspondence to Doreen J. Bartlett, Western University, 1588 Elborn College, London, Ontario, Canada N6E 2H1; e-mail: djbartle@uwo.ca.
Conference/Journal: American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine
Date published: 2021 Mar
Other:
Special Notes: doi:10.1177/15598276211001291 , Word Count: 212
Background. Tai Chi is a form of exercise that is accessible to people from different socioeconomic backgrounds, making it a potentially valuable activity for health promotion of older adults. Purpose. The objective of this scoping review was to summarize the current knowledge about the effectiveness of Tai Chi for older adults across a range of general health outcomes from published, peer reviewed, unique meta-analyses. Methods. Meta-analyses were retrieved from Medline, Embase, AMED, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, PsychINFO, Web of Science, PubMed Health, and the Cochrane Library from database inception to late August 2019. Multistage deduplication and screening processes identified eligible full-length meta-analyses. Two people independently appraised 27 meta-analyses based on the GRADE system and organized results into 3 appendices subsequently collated into heterogeneous, statistically significant, and statistically insignificant tables. Results. “High” and “moderate” quality evidence extracted from these meta-analyses demonstrated that practicing Tai Chi can significantly improve balance, cardiorespiratory fitness, cognition, mobility, proprioception, sleep, and strength; reduce the incidence of falls and nonfatal stroke; and decrease stroke risk factors. Conclusions. Health care providers can now recommend Tai Chi with high level of certainty for health promotion of older adults across a range of general health outcomes for improvement of overall well-being.
Keywords Tai Chi, health promotion, older adults, effectiveness, scoping review
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/15598276211001291