Author: Hirshberg MJ1,2, Goldberg SB1,3,4, Schaefer SM1, Flook L1, Findley D1, Davidson RJ1,5
Affiliation: <sup>1</sup>Center for Healthy Minds, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America.
<sup>2</sup>Department of Educational Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America.
<sup>3</sup>Department of Counseling Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America.
<sup>4</sup>VA Puget Sound Health Care System-Seattle Division, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
<sup>5</sup>Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America.
Conference/Journal: PLoS One.
Date published: 2018 Dec 12
Other:
Volume ID: 13 , Issue ID: 12 , Pages: e0207765 , Special Notes: doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207765. eCollection 2018. , Word Count: 278
Mindfulness practices are increasingly being utilized as a method for cultivating well-being. The term mindfulness is often used as an umbrella for a variety of different practices and many mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) contain multiple styles of practice. Despite the diversity of practices within MBIs, few studies have investigated whether constituent practices produce specific effects. We randomized 156 undergraduates to one of four brief practices: breath awareness, loving-kindness, gratitude, or to an attention control condition. We assessed practice effects on affect following brief training, and effects on affect and behavior after provocation with a stressor (i.e., Cold pressor test). Results indicate that gratitude training significantly improved positive affect compared to breath awareness (d = 0.58) and loving-kindness led to significantly greater reductions in implicit negative affect compared to the control condition (d = 0.59) immediately after brief practice. In spite of gains in positive affect, the gratitude group demonstrated increased reactivity to the stressor, reporting the CPT as significantly more aversive than the control condition (d = 0.46) and showing significantly greater increases in negative affect compared to the breath awareness, loving-kindness, and control groups (ds = 0.55, 0.60, 0.65, respectively). Greater gains in implicit positive affect following gratitude training predicted decreased post-stressor likability ratings of novel neutral faces compared to breath awareness, loving-kindness, and control groups (ds = - 0.39, -0.40, -0.33, respectively) as well. Moreover, the gratitude group was significantly less likely to donate time than the loving-kindness group in an ecologically valid opportunity to provide unrewarded support. These data suggest that different styles of contemplative practice may produce different effects in the context of brief, introductory practice and these differences may be heightened by stress. Implications for the study of contemplative practices are discussed.
PMID: 30540772 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207765