Author: Tew GA1, Howsam J2, Hardy M3, Bissell L2
Affiliation: <sup>1</sup>Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Northumberland Building, Northumberland Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK. garry.tew@northumbria.ac.uk.
<sup>2</sup>Yorkshire Yoga & Therapy Centre, Knaresborough, Harrogate, HG5 0TG, UK.
<sup>3</sup>Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Northumberland Building, Northumberland Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK.
Conference/Journal: BMC Geriatr.
Date published: 2017 Jun 23
Other:
Volume ID: 17 , Issue ID: 1 , Pages: 131 , Special Notes: doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0520-6. , Word Count: 330
BACKGROUND: Yoga is a holistic therapy of expanding popularity, which has the potential to produce a range of physical, mental and social benefits. This trial evaluated the feasibility and effects of an adapted yoga programme on physical function and health-related quality of life in physically-inactive older adults.
METHODS: In this randomised controlled pilot trial, 52 older adults (90% female; mean age 74.8 years, SD 7.2) were randomised 1:1 to a yoga programme or wait-list control. The yoga group (n = 25) received a physical activity education booklet and were invited to attend ten yoga sessions during a 12-week period. The control group (n = 27) received the education booklet only. Measures of physical function (e.g., Short Physical Performance Battery; SPPB), health status (EQ-5D) and mental well-being (Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale; WEMWBS) were assessed at baseline and 3 months. Feasibility was assessed using course attendance and adverse event data, and participant interviews.
RESULTS: Forty-seven participants completed follow-up assessments. Median class attendance was 8 (range 3 to 10). At the 3-month follow-up, the yoga group had a higher SPPB total score compared with the control group (mean difference 0.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.3 to 2.0), a faster time to rise from a chair five times (mean difference - 1.73 s, 95% CI -4.08 to 0.62), and better performance on the chair sit-and-reach lower-limb flexibility test (mean difference 5 cm, 95% CI 0 to 10). The yoga group also had superior health status and mental well-being (vs. control) at 3 months, with mean differences in EQ-5D and WEMWBS scores of 0.12 (95% CI, 0.03 to 0.21) and 6 (95% CI, 1 to 11), respectively. The interviews indicated that participants valued attending the yoga programme, and that they experienced a range of benefits.
CONCLUSIONS: The adapted yoga programme appeared to be feasible and potentially beneficial in terms of improving mental and social well-being and aspects of physical function in physically-inactive older adults. An appropriately-powered trial is required to confirm the findings of the present study and to determine longer-term effects.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02663726 .
KEYWORDS: Aged; Mental health; Mind-body therapies; Physical fitness; Randomised controlled trial
PMID: 28645259 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-017-0520-6