Acupuncture in ancient China: How important was it really? 


Author: Lehmann H.

Affiliation: Deutsches Institut für TCM, Cranachstr. 1, D-12157 Berlin, Germany E-mail: Lehmann@tcm.de. 
Conference/Journal: J Integr Med.
Date published: 2013 Jan
Other:
 Volume ID: 11   ,  Issue ID: 1   ,  Pages: 45-53   ,  Special Notes: doi: 10.3736/jintegrmed2013008   ,  Word Count: 149  
    

Although acupuncture theory is a fundamental part of the Huangdi Neijing, the clinical application of the needle therapy in ancient China was always a limited one. From early times there have been warnings that acupuncture might do harm. In books like Zhang Zhongjing's Shanghanlun it plays only a marginal role. Among the 400 emperors in Chinese history, acupuncture was hardly ever applied. After Xu Dachun called acupuncture a "lost tradition" in 1757, the abolition of acupuncture and moxibustion from the Imperial Medical Academy in 1822 was a radical, but consequent act. When traditional Chinese medicine was revived after 1954, the "New Acupuncture" was completely different from what it had been in ancient China. The conclusion, however, is a positive one: The best time acupuncture ever had was not the Song dynasty or Yuan dynasty, but is now - and the future of acupuncture does not lie in old scripts, but in ourselves.

PMID: 23464646