Respiratory training interventions improve health status of heart failure patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.


Author: Wang MH1, Yeh ML2

Affiliation: <sup>1</sup>School of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei 11219, Taiwan.

<sup>2</sup>School of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei 11219, Taiwan. meiling@ntunhs.edu.tw.
Conference/Journal: World J Clin Cases.
Date published: 2019 Sep 26
Other:
 Volume ID: 7   ,  Issue ID: 18   ,  Pages: 2760-2775   ,  Special Notes: doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i18.2760.   ,  Word Count: 308  
    BACKGROUND: Prior studies indicate that doing breathing exercises improves physical performance and quality of life (QoL) in heart failure patients. However, these effects remain unclear and contradictory.



AIM: To determine the effects of machine-assisted and non-machine-assisted respiratory training on physical performance and QoL in heart failure patients.



METHODS: This was a systematic review and network meta-analysis study. A literature search of electronic databases was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on heart failure. Respiratory training interventions were grouped as seven categories: IMT_Pn (inspiratory muscle training without pressure or < 10% maximal inspiratory pressure, MIP), IMT_Pl (inspiratory muscle training with low pressure, 10%-15% MIP), IMT_Pm (inspiratory muscle training with medium pressure, 30%-40% MIP), IMT_Ph (inspiratory muscle training with high pressure, 60% MIP or MIP plus aerobics), Aerobics (aerobic exercise or weight training), Qi_Ex (tai chi, yoga, and breathing exercise), and none. The four outcomes were heart rate, peak oxygen uptake (VO2 peak), 6-min walking distance test (6MWT), and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure QoL. The random-effects model, side-splitting model, and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) were used to test and analyze the data.



RESULTS: A total of 1499 subjects from 31 RCT studies were included. IMT_Ph had the highest effect sizes for VO2 peak and 6MWT, IMT_Pm highest for QoL, and Qi_Ex highest for heart rate. Aerobics had the second highest for VO2 peak, Qi_Ex second highest for 6MWT, and IMT_Ph second highest for heart rate and QoL.



CONCLUSION: This study supports that high- and medium-intensity machine-assisted training improves exercise capacity and QoL in hospital-based heart failure patients. After hospital discharge, non-machine-assisted training continuously improves cardiac function.



©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.



KEYWORDS: Cardiac function; Exercise capacity; Heart failure; Network meta-analysis; Quality of life; Respiratory training



PMID: 31616691 PMCID: PMC6789387 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i18.2760